"THE IMPORTANT THING IS NOT TO STOP QUESTIONING. CURIOSITY HAS ITS OWN REASON FOR EXISTING. ONE CANNOT HELP BUT BE IN AWE WHEN HE CONTEMPLATES THE MYSTERIES OF ETERNITY, OF LIFE, OF THE MARVELOUS STRUCTURE OF REALITY. IT IS ENOUGH IF ONE TRIES MERELY TO COMPREHEND A LITTLE OF THIS MYSTERY EVERY DAY. NEVER LOSE A HOLY CURIOSITY." ---ALBERT EINSTEIN
Friday, April 6, 2012
Visitation to Oceanside High School
I was very excited
to visit a school that was using iPads in the classroom on a day-to-day
basis. After visiting Oceanside High School, I witnessed technology
integration with the iPad mainly through the form of assessment.
Specifically, Bell Work and quizzes. The first class I observed used
iPads as a Bell Work activity. Students were asked to complete multiple
questions before being allowed to move on to their experiments. I really
liked that the teacher was able to create a bank of questions so that
every student may get a different question or the same question with
different variables. I liked that this form of Bell Work allowed
students to work collaboratively in solving the questions. It fueled
group work, collaboration, and the ability to problem solve. However, I
wanted to see more resources available on the iPad so that the student
had a resource they could refer to prior to asking a peer for help. The
students were not really held accountable for their critical thinking
abilities because many of them would immediately ask a peer instead of
looking at the question critically and dissecting it. I also saw a very
unique problem emerge. Because students were able to take the
assessments at home, there were quite a few students "killing time"
until it was time to do the experiment. I liked that a student could
complete or retake an assessment at home but I did not like that there
were individuals that took advantage of this fantastic alternative and
sat in their seats wasting class time, but I really liked that the
assessment randomized the questions and was able to provide the teacher
with instant feedback while fueling collaborative learning and problem
solving. The second class I observed used the iPad as a form of
assessment having students take their science test directly on the iPad.
Again, the teacher created a bank of questions that were randomly
distributed to each student. After observing both classes, I was able to
speak to both teachers and they informed me that they have yet to fully
outline all the benefits and resources the iPad has to offer and that
this was just the beginning. With this in mind, I think these teachers
are beginning to make progressive steps towards technology usage in the
classroom. Nonetheless, I still wanted to see more use out of the iPad
not just through assessments. For example, all the iPads had a periodic
table app but upon opening the app all that was displayed was the
periodic table of the elements. It looked identical to the one pinned on
the wall. This made me think. The iPad is an interactive interface that
teaches through interaction and games. Why can't I combine elements to
see what happens? Why can't I watch a video where I witness how these
two elements would or could be combined? Why can't I interact with the
periodic table of elements? These were the questions that continued
through my mind as the teachers spoke. Yet again, I realize that this is
just the tip of technological iceberg but I am just too anxious to see
what will come next and wanted to see more. I look forward to the future of technology integration in the classroom.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment